Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Add additionalContentExclusionPolicies to SessionConfig (public high-level API)

Open
#1,702 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
65/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Quiet
Tech stack
typescript
Domain
api

Research direction

Start at the public SessionConfigBase interface and the createSession() and resumeSession() entry points, then compare their mapping to the generated SessionOpenOptions type. Confirm how the existing low-level policy fields are represented and exported. Done means the public types are documented, policies are forwarded atomically on creation and resume, and coverage verifies both paths.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement

Add additionalContentExclusionPolicies to SessionConfig (public high-level API)

Summary

The Copilot SDK exposes content exclusion policy support at the low-level RPC layer
(SessionOpenOptions.additionalContentExclusionPolicies, session.rpc.options.update,
session.rpc.permissions.configure) but does not surface it through the public
SessionConfig / SessionConfigBase interface used by createSession() and
resumeSession(). This makes it impossible for SDK consumers to set per-session
content exclusion rules through the documented, stable public API.

Motivation

Content exclusion is a core compliance and data-governance feature. At GitHub
organization level, admins configure it via repository settings. However, SDK
consumers — especially those building multi-tenant agentic applications — need to
inject additional exclusion rules per session, beyond what GitHub org settings provide:

  • Multi-tenant SaaS: Each tenant has their own data classification rules that
    must not be shared with the model context (PII paths, credentials directories,
    confidential source trees).
  • Regulated environments (GxP, HIPAA, SOC 2): Compliance requirements dictate
    that certain file patterns are never read by the model, regardless of what
    the repository-level GitHub policy says.
  • Agent isolation: Pipeline orchestrators that spawn per-role sessions need to
    scope each session's readable context to only the files that role is authorized
    to see, without coupling this to GitHub org settings.
Current workaround (and why it is insufficient)

The only way to set exclusion rules today is via session.rpc.permissions.configure()
after the session is created:

const session = await client.createSession({ ... });

// Race condition: session may have already started reading files before this call
await session.rpc.permissions.configure({
  additionalContentExclusionPolicies: [{
    rules: [{ paths: ["**/secrets/**", "**/.env*"], source: { name: "tenant-policy", type: "host" } }],
    last_updated_at: Date.now(),
    scope: "all",
  }],
});

Problems:

  1. Race condition: The session may read files before the configure call returns.
    There is no way to guarantee exclusion rules are active before the first turn.
  2. Undocumented surface: session.rpc is a low-level raw RPC accessor marked
    @experimental. Nothing in the README or SDK docs points consumers here for
    content exclusion.
  3. Inconsistent with the rest of the API: Every other security-relevant session
    option (availableTools, excludedTools, onPermissionRequest,
    skipCustomInstructions, gitHubToken, skipEmbeddingRetrieval) is set
    through SessionConfigBase. Content exclusion policies should follow the same
    pattern.
  4. Mid-session update (rpc.options.update) is the only per-turn path: There is
    no way to supply policies atomically with the session creation RPC.
Proposed change

Add additionalContentExclusionPolicies to SessionConfigBase:

export interface SessionConfigBase {
  // ... existing fields ...

  /**
   * Additional content-exclusion policies to merge into the session's policy set
   * on creation (and on resume). Rules are evaluated alongside natively-discovered
   * GitHub organization / repository policies.
   *
   * Use this to inject application-level or tenant-level path exclusions that
   * are not covered by GitHub organization settings — for example, in multi-tenant
   * deployments where each session must be scoped to its tenant's permitted file set.
   *
   * Each policy rule that matches a file path will cause the CLI to deny Copilot
   * access to that file, equivalent to a `PermissionDecisionDeniedByContentExclusionPolicy`
   * outcome on the permission request for that path.
   *
   * @example
   * ```typescript
   * const session = await client.createSession({
   *   additionalContentExclusionPolicies: [{
   *     scope: "all",
   *     last_updated_at: Date.now(),
   *     rules: [
   *       {
   *         paths: ["**/.env*", "**/secrets/**", "**/*.pem"],
   *         source: { name: "tenant-compliance-policy", type: "host" },
   *       },
   *     ],
   *   }],
   * });
   * ```
   *
   * @experimental
   */
  additionalContentExclusionPolicies?: ContentExclusionPolicy[];
}

The ContentExclusionPolicy / ContentExclusionPolicyRule types should be exported
as first-class public types (not re-exports of the generated RPC types), with clear
JSDoc:

/** Scope for a content exclusion policy. */
export type ContentExclusionPolicyScope = "repo" | "all";

/** A single rule within a content exclusion policy. */
export interface ContentExclusionPolicyRule {
  /** Glob patterns for file paths to exclude from Copilot context. */
  paths: string[];
  /** The rule is active only when at least one of these patterns matches the file content. */
  ifAnyMatch?: string[];
  /** The rule is active only when none of these patterns matches the file content. */
  ifNoneMatch?: string[];
  /** Source label identifying who issued this rule. */
  source: { name: string; type: string };
}

/** A content exclusion policy applied to a session. */
export interface ContentExclusionPolicy {
  /** The rules that make up this policy. */
  rules: ContentExclusionPolicyRule[];
  /** ISO 8601 timestamp or Unix ms epoch when the policy was last updated. */
  last_updated_at: string | number;
  /** Whether the policy applies to the current repository only, or all repositories. */
  scope: ContentExclusionPolicyScope;
}
Expected behavior
  • Policies supplied in SessionConfig.additionalContentExclusionPolicies are
    applied atomically with the session creation RPC (SessionOpenOptions), before
    any tool execution can occur.
  • On resumeSession, the same field re-applies the policies so resumed sessions
    respect updated tenant rules.
  • Policies compose with GitHub org-level exclusions (same as the current RPC
    behavior): a file is excluded if it matches any policy from any source.
Alternatives considered
  • Rely on onPermissionRequest to deny individual file reads: This works per
    permission prompt but does not prevent the model from receiving file content via
    attachment or retrieval paths that do not go through the permission system.
  • Use availableTools / excludedTools to remove read tools: Too coarse —
    this removes read access entirely rather than scoping it to allowed paths.
  • GitHub org content exclusion settings: Not available in multi-tenant scenarios
    where the SDK host is not a GitHub organization admin, or where tenants are
    not GitHub entities at all.
References
  • Generated RPC types: SessionOpenOptions.additionalContentExclusionPolicies,
    PermissionsConfigureParams.additionalContentExclusionPolicies,
    OptionsUpdateParams.additionalContentExclusionPolicies
  • Related: SessionConfigBase.gitHubToken — per-session GitHub identity for
    org-level content exclusion discovery
  • Related: SessionConfigBase.availableTools / excludedTools — tool-level
    filtering, not path-level content filtering
Dominant language
Java
Stars
10.5k
Forks
1.5k
Avg merge
1d 9h
Merged PRs (30d)
131

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from github/copilot-sdk

All issues in github/copilot-sdk

Similar issues

More Java issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.