ask_user form: pressing Esc silently discards the entire form instead of clearing current input
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 65/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- cli, shell
- Domain
- cli, developer-experience
Research direction
Look for the form handling code in the CLI, likely in a module for the ask_user tool or interactive prompts. Find where Esc key is captured and the current behavior that cancels the form. Compare with the normal prompt input clearing logic. Test by running the CLI and triggering a form to understand the flow. The fix should change the Esc handler to clear the current field instead of closing the form, and ensure a distinct action (like a different key combination) is used for form cancellation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the bug
When answering an agent-presented form (via the ask_user/elicitation tool), pressing Esc closes/cancels the whole form. Everywhere else in the CLI, Esc clears the current text input (per /help: "esc esc - clear input, interrupt, stop agents, or rewind"). This inconsistency makes it very easy to accidentally lose an entire in-progress form response when the user's intent was just to clear/edit the current field.
Expected behavior
Esc inside a form field should clear that field's current text (consistent with normal prompt behavior), not close/cancel the form. A separate, distinct key/action should be used to actually cancel the form.
Additional context
This came up in a real session: the user had already answered one question in a multi-field form, hit Esc intending to clear/edit text, and the entire form closed with no indication of what (if anything) was preserved. The agent had no way to tell whether the cancellation was intentional or not.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Avg merge
- 14h 16m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/copilot-cli
-
triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
github/copilot-cli#4932 ·
-
triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
github/copilot-cli#4909 ·
-
triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
github/copilot-cli#4906 ·
-
triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/copilot-cli#4848 ·
-
area:agents area:mcp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/copilot-cli#4729 ·
All issues in github/copilot-cli
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
elastic/gradle-plugins#156 ·
-
Priority/High ready-for-agent Severity/Major Type/Bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
comp/cli P3 type/docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#119756 · 1 comment ·
-
comp: build/pipeline type: bug version: current (v17+)
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
angular/angularfire#3766 ·
-
out-of-date
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
CachyOS/CachyOS-PKGBUILDS#1903 ·