Flag duplicate code identifiers as invalid

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Description

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from github/codeql-coding-standards

• `RULE-10-0-1`: Structured bindings should not be reported as violations Open
  false positive/false negative Stardard-MISRA-C++

  Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100

  github/codeql-coding-standards#1172 · Opened Aug 5, 2026

• `RULE-10-4`: False negatives as rule does not currently consider ternaries Open
  Difficulty-Low false positive/false negative false-negative Impact-Low Standard-MISRA-C

  Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100

  github/codeql-coding-standards#821 · Opened Dec 12, 2024

• `EXP39-C`: False positives related to compatible types, harmless casts Open
  Difficulty-Medium false positive/false negative false-positive Impact-Medium Standard-CERT-C

  Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100

  github/codeql-coding-standards#1200 · Opened Sep 20, 2026

• `RULE-0-0-1`: "unreachable statement" false positives due to over-pruning of the control-flow graph Open
  false positive/false negative

  Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100

  github/codeql-coding-standards#1190 · Opened Aug 28, 2026

• `RULE-0-1-1`: Findings should be suppressed for [[maybe_unused]] initialization Open
  false positive/false negative

  Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100

  github/codeql-coding-standards#1175 · Opened Aug 20, 2026

All issues in github/codeql-coding-standards