Use QL for QL to check for omissions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- devtools
Research direction
Start by reading the linked issue comment and pull request #511 to understand the proposed dependency and the compiler-generated constructs under discussion. Then review the repository's CodeQL queries for remaining omission opportunities. Done means a systematic check has been defined and any remaining omissions are identified or addressed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
as described here there may be a few queries where compiler generated constructs need to be omitted
this issue attempts to capture a more systematic approach to verify if there are remaining opportunities for this
assuming that this issue will have a dependency of this work
cc: @rvermeulen
- Dominant language
- CodeQL
- Stars
- 227
- Forks
- 82
- Avg merge
- 6d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/codeql-coding-standards
-
false positive/false negative Stardard-MISRA-C++
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/codeql-coding-standards#1172 ·
-
Difficulty-Low false positive/false negative false-negative Impact-Low Standard-MISRA-C
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty-Medium false positive/false negative false-positive Impact-Medium Standard-CERT-C
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
github/codeql-coding-standards#1200 ·
-
`RULE-0-0-1`: "unreachable statement" false positives due to over-pruning of the control-flow graph Openfalse positive/false negative
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
github/codeql-coding-standards#1190 ·
-
false positive/false negative
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
github/codeql-coding-standards#1175 ·
All issues in github/codeql-coding-standards
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ScoopInstaller/Nonportable#639 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
ScoopInstaller/Extras#18800 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
uqbar-project/website-wollok-ts#84 · 2 comments ·
-
on hold T: core-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100