CVE request status for GHSA-2mcf-xcq4-jvpf and GHSA-wqgw-crr5-cr2p
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Review the two linked GitHub Security Advisories and the repository security advisory workflow referenced in the issue. Confirm whether the existing CVE requests are pending or need more information, and document the appropriate contact route or status response.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I am following up on two published repository security advisories:
-
Bernstein
- Advisory: https://github.com/sipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein/security/advisories/GHSA-2mcf-xcq4-jvpf
- Package: bernstein (PyPI)
- Published: August 14, 2026
- Affected versions: < 3.15.0
- Patched version: 3.15.0
-
VTCode
- Advisory: https://github.com/vinhnx/VTCode/security/advisories/GHSA-wqgw-crr5-cr2p
- Package: vtcode (crates.io)
- Published: August 14, 2026
- Affected versions: < 0.145.0
- Patched version: >= 0.145.0
According to the repository maintainers, CVE requests were submitted through GitHub's repository security advisory workflow for both advisories. I do not know the exact request dates. Both advisories are public but currently show no associated CVE identifier.
Could you confirm whether these existing CVE requests are pending or require additional information? If this is not the appropriate channel, please direct me to the correct contact route.
I understand there may be a processing backlog. This is a status inquiry for existing CVE requests, not a duplicate CVE request.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 48
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
palladius/rails8-app-on-gcp#142 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
corsairdev/corsair#1764 ·
-
oblt-aw/detector/security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100