Two published repository advisories not ingested into the Advisory Database after eight days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
No files, tests, or code entry points are named. Start by checking the ingestion status for GHSA-8c32-52rh-j928 and GHSA-r4f8-3xc4-c8vw, along with their repository publication and package metadata; done means both advisories are present in the Advisory Database and OSV.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi — flagging two repository-level advisories that were published on 2026-08-22 and, eight days later, still return 404 at github.com/advisories/ and are absent from OSV:
GHSA-8c32-52rh-j928— netcarver/textile (Composer), published by the maintainer, fixed in 4.1.5GHSA-r4f8-3xc4-c8vw— cloudpathlib (PyPI), published by the maintainer, fixed in 0.25.0
Both are published on their repositories and both have a released fix, so downstream users should be getting a signal. Right now composer audit/Packagist shows nothing for netcarver/textile, and Dependabot shows nothing for cloudpathlib <= 0.24.0.
For comparison, two other advisories I reported were reviewed and ingested quickly — GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv the same day it published, and GHSA-f2ff-p2ww-7p4p within about two days — so these two look like they may have been missed rather than deliberately held.
Is there anything the maintainers or I need to do on our side, or is this just review backlog? Happy to wait if it's the latter; I mainly wanted to make sure they hadn't fallen out of the queue.
Thanks for maintaining this.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 48
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
channels:add check:passed
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
confluentinc/dbt-confluent#160 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
AstrBotDevs/AstrBot#10205 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100