GHSA-8v8j-3hxp-93wr / GHSA-wwpq-f5c3-7hvx: Dependabot incorrectly flags spring-boot 4.1.0 as vulnerable
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- spring-boot
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Start by locating the records for GHSA-8v8j-3hxp-93wr and GHSA-wwpq-f5c3-7hvx, then trace how their vulnerable ranges are represented and compared with Spring Boot versions. Determine whether the advisory data or comparison behavior causes 4.1.0 to be flagged; done means the alert no longer applies to 4.1.0 and the affected range remains accurate.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Dependabot is generating alerts for org.springframework.boot:spring-boot:4.1.0 against both GHSA-8v8j-3hxp-93wr and GHSA-wwpq-f5c3-7hvx.
Problem
Both advisories explicitly define the vulnerable range as >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.6 for the 4.x branch.
4.1.0 > 4.0.6 — it is mathematically outside the vulnerable range. Spring Boot 4.1.0 was released after 4.0.6 and includes the fixes for both CVEs.
The advisory descriptions confirm this:
- GHSA-8v8j-3hxp-93wr: "Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5; upgrade to 4.0.6 or later"
- GHSA-wwpq-f5c3-7hvx: "Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5 (fix 4.0.6)"
Impact
Repositories using Spring Boot 4.1.0 (the latest release) receive incorrect CRITICAL and HIGH Dependabot alerts for vulnerabilities that do not affect them.
Expected behaviour
Dependabot should not flag spring-boot:4.1.0 since 4.1.0 >= 4.0.6.
Suggestion
If the advisory is correct as written and the scanner is the bug, please fix the version comparison logic.
If 4.1.x is also affected (which the advisory text contradicts), please add a separate vulnerable range >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.x with an explicit patched version.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 48
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
punkpeye/mcp-remote#369 ·
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
cisagov/vulnrichment#337 ·
-
bug DUP Reservations
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
bcgov/reserve-rec-public#896 ·