Need CVE auto-linking disambiguation to CVEs that belong to more than 1 project
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- github
- Domain
- security
Research direction
Review the CVE-2023-44487 examples and linked advisory-database PR #2860 first, then trace the existing CVE auto-linking behavior; no implementation entry point is named here. Done means CVEs assigned outside GitHub link to MITRE or another CVE database instead of an unrelated GitHub advisory, while GitHub-assigned advisories retain their current links.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Description:
A CVE reference auto-linking should not link to a Github advisory if Github didn't assign the CVE ID (meaning the CVE came from somewhere else).
These kinds of CVE auto-linking should instead link to the MITRE (or other online CVE database) for that entry instead.
This will make it obvious that the CVE is bigger than the one project on github that is using the existing CVE id to update the impacted packages entries.
History:
The recent big CVE, CVE-2023-44487 (HTTP/2 Rapid Reset) was originally filed as a spec level CVE (against the HTTP/2 spec itself).
Over time, many projects have referenced CVE-2023-44487 in discussions, pull requests, issues, etc.
The use of CVE-2023-4487 auto-links to the https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 advisory, which is for a limited set of impacted packages on the swift-nio-http2 project. (see long listing of impacted packages at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44487)
See concern brought up at https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/2860
This results in confusing links to an unrelated project and advisory.
Examples in Discussions:
Examples in Release Notes:
Examples in Issues:
Examples in PRs:
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Avg merge
- 3d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/advisory-database
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
All issues in github/advisory-database
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
oblt-aw/detector/security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
setup tools wizard offers no GitHub auth path, and setup summary doesn't recognize `gh` CLI auth Openarea/auth comp/cli P3 tool/skills type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#121131 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
trailofbits/skills#330 ·
-
accepted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100