Configurable issue labels
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 58/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- tooling
Research direction
The issue does not name files or tests. Start by locating the scanner's label-creation and configuration entry points, then trace how issue labels and rule labels are selected. Done means label creation can be disabled or customized as requested, the default behavior is defined, and the available options are documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Trying the scanner for the first time, I’m very happy with how it works except for one thing: it creates too many labels for its issues. Screenshot of my sphinx-wagtail-theme setup:
That’s just too much noise in our label dropdowns that will interfere with triage of other issues. It’s made worse because with alphanum sorting all those axe labels will be at the top. Personally I’d say it’s also too much noise for listings too.
Proposed solution
Make this configurable. I would prefer to have no labels at all, or otherwise the option to use a label of my choosing at least, like our existing accessibility label. My feedback label-by-label:
axe-scanning-issue: make this label configurable. It’s nice those issues are auto-labelled but I think I’d always prefer to use our genericaccessibilitylabel instead.axe-rule labels: allow switching on/off. This is very useful information but just way too much noise within label sets used for other types of work.best-practice: I don’t see myself ever wanting this. It’s useful information but again just not worth the noise in label sets.
My personal preference would be to have all of this off by default so you can make a conscious decision of what labels to use. None of those labels / label creation behavior is currently documented so this threw me off.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 374
- Forks
- 42
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/accessibility-scanner
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/accessibility-scanner#264 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
github/accessibility-scanner#260 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 50/100
github/accessibility-scanner#259 ·
-
Sitemap Support Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
github/accessibility-scanner#244 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
github/accessibility-scanner#210 · 3 comments ·
All issues in github/accessibility-scanner
Similar issues
-
Browser Waiting for: Product Owner
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
getsentry/sentry-javascript#24577 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#640 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
copse-dev/agent-pane#2953 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
githubnext/rig#534 ·
-
automation missing-model model-sync provider:pioneer
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
anomalyco/models.dev#7701 ·