Agent cuts release without explicit user request
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 64/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- release
Research direction
Start by reading the release-package skill's operating policy and the release.yml workflow, then trace how a diagnosis request can reach the release path. Ensure diagnosis produces findings or proposed fixes without initiating a release unless the user explicitly requests one, and verify the workflow still supports explicitly requested releases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
When asked to diagnose a deployment problem, Junior cut a patch release of the junior package without being asked to. The user had only asked for diagnosis of why Vercel wasn't showing route traffic.
What happened:
- User reported staging Vercel not showing route traffic
- Junior diagnosed an upstream
juniorNitro()wiring gap in 0.65.0 and immediately dispatchedrelease.ymlbump=patch, approved the publish issue, and merged it to npm - User had not requested a release; they wanted diagnosis and root-cause analysis
Root cause of the mistake:
The release-package skill's operating policy says "proceed without asking for confirmation" when someone asks to make a release. Junior misapplied this policy to a diagnosis request and treated identifying a potential fix as sufficient authorization to cut a release.
Impact:
An unnecessary 0.65.1 release was published. The release may also have been based on an incorrect diagnosis — the actual cause of missing Vercel route traffic was not yet confirmed.
Expected behavior:
Junior should not initiate releases unless explicitly asked. Diagnosis tasks should produce findings and proposed fixes, not autonomous release actions.
Action taken on behalf of David Cramer.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 358
- Forks
- 38
- Avg merge
- 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 199
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from getsentry/junior
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
All issues in getsentry/junior
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
bug clawsweeper:linked-pr-open clawsweeper:needs-live-repro clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr impact:message-loss issue-rating: 🐚 platinum hermit P2 regression
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
danielmiessler/LifeOS#2218 ·