rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Benchmark with different allocators

Open

#1 441 ouverte le 26 juin 2019

Voir sur GitHub
 (8 commentaires) (2 réactions) (0 assignés)Rust (1 726 forks)batch import
E-hardfungood first issue

Métriques du dépôt

Stars
 (14 924 stars)
Métriques de merge PR
 (Merge moyen 3j 11h) (113 PRs mergées en 30 j)

Description

The recent paper about https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc sounds too good to be true.

It might be a good idea to compare different allocators to see if there are some memory usage wins to have. Better perf would also be helpful, but memory usage is the most important thing

Here's the couple of benchmarks that should be representative (you can use any other large project instead of chalk, for example, rust-analyzer itself):

cargo run --package ra_cli --release -- analysis-bench ../chalk/ --complete ../chalk/chalk-engine/src/logic.rs:94:0
cargo run --package ra_cli --release -- analysis-stats ../chalk

I think /usr/bin/time could be used to compare both time and memory (rss)?

We need to compare at least:

  • jemalloc
  • mimalloc
  • system allocator (bonus points if you check with different OSes)

Guide contributeur