exaloop/codon

static compilation option?

Ouverte

#82 ouverte le 10 déc. 2022

 (8 commentaires) (9 réactions) (0 personne assignée)C++ (492 forks)batch import
enhancementhelp wanted

Métriques du dépôt

Stars
 (13 667 étoiles)
Métriques de merge PR
 (Merge moyen 5j 10h) (3 PRs mergées en 30 j)

Description

After I successfully compiled a test python program using codon build <demo.py>, on macOS Monterey (intel), I checked the dependencies as per the following:

$ otool -L demo
demo:
	@rpath/libcodonrt.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
	@rpath/libomp.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0)
	/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1319.0.0)
	/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.11)

The two @rpath dependencies, libcodonrt.dylib and libomp.dylib are included in the codon distribution, they are 1.2M and 772K respectively so not so large.

Is there any thought to having static libraries of these two dependencies available so one may statically compile the executable instead to make it more relocatable?

Guide contributeur