Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

check.milter: fail_open does not cover a milter session-dial failure

Open
#866 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
go
Domain
backend

Research direction

Read internal/check/milter/milter.go, especially CheckStateForMsg and the existing ioError handling. Review the regression test mentioned in PR #865 and verify that an unreachable milter with fail_open enabled accepts the message unchecked while the test passes.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Summary

check.milter's fail_open directive is documented to let a message through when the milter can't be consulted, but it silently doesn't cover one specific failure mode: the milter being completely unreachable when maddy tries to establish a session.

Root cause

CheckStateForMsg (internal/check/milter/milter.go) dials the milter backend via c.cl.Session() and returns any error unconditionally. This happens before a *state exists, so the failure never reaches ioError() — the only place fail_open is actually checked. Result: with fail_open set, a message is still hard-rejected (a real SMTP-level error handed back to the original sender) if the milter is simply down — exactly the case fail_open exists to guard against.

Reproduction

Configure check.milter with fail_open: true pointing at a milter address that's genuinely unreachable (e.g. nothing listening on that port), then send a message through. Expected: message accepted unchecked, per fail_open. Actual: a hard SMTP-level rejection.

Fix

I've prepared and tested a fix — handles the dial failure the same way ioError() already handles a later I/O failure — and opened it as #865, with a regression test that fails against unpatched code and passes with the fix.

Apologies for the PR arriving before this issue — I realize CONTRIBUTING.md's process is to raise the issue first. Filing this now so there's a proper place to discuss the bug alongside the PR.

Dominant language
Go
Stars
6.1k
Forks
327
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from foxcpp/maddy

All issues in foxcpp/maddy

Similar issues

More Go issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.