Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Preserve state variables across file-reading loops

Open
#1,475 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
55/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
java, perl
Domain
compilers

Research direction

Start with t/03-Nulls.t and t/04-Fix-Overlay.t, then trace the state-variable handling for source-file reads in both the JVM and interpreter backends. Preserve the filehandle loop, $. == 1 branch, and object assignment in a regression test. Done means both focused tests pass on both backends and the complete suite remains successful.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

area:backend area:cpan-port area:runtime bug

Summary

DataExtract::FixedWidth 0.09 fails two upstream tests under PerlOnJava because a state variable declared inside a file-reading loop does not retain the constructed object between iterations. The first iteration should initialize $fw; on the next iteration $fw is undefined and the test dies calling parse.

Reproduction

This was found in CPAN random run 20260921-124328-13959 at PerlOnJava commit d8e4fd417.

The affected upstream tests are:

  • t/03-Nulls.t
  • t/04-Fix-Overlay.t

Both tests have the same relevant structure:

while (my $line = <$fh>) {
    state $fw;

    if ($. == 1) {
        $fw = DataExtract::FixedWidth->new({
            header_row   => $line,
            null_as_undef => 1, # or fix_overlay => 1
        });
    }
    else {
        my $arr_ref = $fw->parse($line);
    }
}

Under PerlOnJava, the constructor branch runs for the first line, but $fw is undefined on the second line. The test then dies with:

Can't call method "parse" on an undefined value

The failure reproduces when running the actual test files with both the JVM backend and the interpreter backend. It is not a timeout or a dependency-installation failure.

Expected behavior

state $fw should retain its value for subsequent loop iterations, as it does under standard Perl. The first line should construct a DataExtract::FixedWidth object and later lines should call parse on that same object.

Results

Standard Perl passes the focused tests:

t/03-Nulls.t ........ ok
t/04-Fix-Overlay.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=15

The archived standard-Perl oracle also passes the complete distribution suite: 18 test files, 82 tests.

PerlOnJava fails:

t/03-Nulls.t       exited 255; planned 12 tests, ran 0
t/04-Fix-Overlay.t exited 255; planned 3 tests, ran 0
Files=18, Tests=68
Failed 2/18 test programs

The remaining 16 test programs pass. The test files are reproducible on both PerlOnJava execution backends.

Suspected area

The immediate failure surface is lowering or runtime handling of file-scoped state variables in this loop context. The interaction with Perl's $. input-line counter is also worth checking: the initialization branch is selected using $. == 1, and PerlOnJava may be handling the line counter or its association with the newly opened filehandle differently in the failing source-file context.

A simple scalar state loop can appear to work in a minimal -e invocation, so the regression test should preserve the source-file form, filehandle read loop, $. == 1 branch, and object assignment shown above.

Environment and scope

  • Distribution: DataExtract::FixedWidth 0.09
  • PerlOnJava backends: JVM and interpreter
  • Standard Perl oracle: Perl 5.42.2 on macOS
  • Native/XS code: none
  • Reverse-dependency analysis: not applicable; this is a pure-Perl distribution

This is an upstream compatibility failure, not a failure caused by missing services, display requirements, native libraries, or unsupported XS code.

Dominant language
Perl
Stars
64
Forks
6
Avg merge
5h 11m
Merged PRs (30d)
168

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from fglock/PerlOnJava

All issues in fglock/PerlOnJava

Similar issues

More Perl issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.