Implement #map#to_h vs #each_with_object
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- performance
Research direction
Read the linked Medium article first to understand the intended comparison between #map#to_h and #each_with_object. Then inspect the repository's existing Ruby idiom and benchmark entries to find where this comparison belongs; done means the relevant comparison is documented consistently with the surrounding entries.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 5.7k
- Forks
- 370
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from fastruby/fast-ruby
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 52/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 32/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
All issues in fastruby/fast-ruby
Similar issues
-
SyncEm always forwards a dummy block, so wrapped methods lose their no-block/Enumerator behavior Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
dependabot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-cao#13349 ·
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·