Reference oracle and required build output share ./executable, causing agents to overwrite the oracle
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- devtools, infrastructure
Research direction
Start by inspecting the ProgramBench harness and standard instructions around compile.sh, ./executable, and the proposed PROGRAMBENCH_REFERENCE_EXECUTABLE entry point. Reproduce the overwrite sequence, then verify that repeated candidate builds leave the reference independently executable and reserve ./executable for the candidate.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
We ran into this a couple of times now, so I wanted to report the following:
Description
Summary
The standard ProgramBench instructions assign two incompatible roles to the same path:
./executableis the reference oracle that the agent must probe.compile.shmust produce the candidate as./executable.
A normal iterative build therefore replaces the reference oracle. Every later probe of ./executable invokes the candidate, potentially causing the agent to compare its implementation with itself while believing it is stil observing the reference.
This is not task-specific; it affects any ProgramBench task using this workspace contract.
Reproduction
- Start a ProgramBench task and probe the supplied
./executable. - Write an ordinary
compile.shthat compiles the candidate with output
./executable. - Run
compile.shduring development to test the candidate. - Probe
./executableagain.
The fourth step now runs the candidate. The original reference path has been lost.
Execute-only file permissions do not prevent this when the agent can modify the containing workspace directory: the pathname can still be unlinked and replaced.
We observed this independently in two private local trajectories. In one case, the agent later moved ./executable to preserve what it believed was the reference, but the path had already been overwritten by an earlier build. Subsequent reference comparisons were therefore not independent.
No benchmark score or unpublished evaluator behavior is needed to reproduce the problem.
Impact
- Iterative candidate builds can destroy the only behavioral oracle.
- Later “reference” probes may silently become candidate self-comparisons.
- Agents can derive incorrect behavioral contracts from contaminate evidence.
- Results may understate agent capability for reasons unrelated to the reconstruction itself.
Suggested fix
Separate the paths in the harness before the agent starts:
- Preserve the reference at something like
/opt/programbench-reference/executable. - Make that file executable but neither readable nor writable by the agent.
- Keep it under a root-owned directory the agent cannot modify or unlink from.
- Optionally expose its path through
PROGRAMBENCH_REFERENCE_EXECUTABLE. - Reserve workspace-root
./executableexclusively for the candidate produced
bycompile.sh. - Update the instructions so all oracle probes use the immutable reference
path.
This retains ProgramBench’s anti-copy/anti-smuggling boundary while allowing the agent to compile and test candidates repeatedly.
A prompt-only instruction telling the agent to move the reference before building would reduce the problem, but enforcing separation in the harness is more reliable.
Expected behavior
The reference oracle remains independently executable for the entire inference trajectory, while compile.sh can freely recreate ./executable as the candidate submission.
With kind regards
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 928
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from facebookresearch/ProgramBench
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 58/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
facebookresearch/ProgramBench#50 · 1 comment ·
All issues in facebookresearch/ProgramBench
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
anthropics/skills#1811 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
speaches-ai/speaches#678 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
datalayer/mcp-compose#42 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
conda-forge/spacy-feedstock#177 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals#2523 ·