Forth implementation?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- compilers
Research direction
Start by reading the issue and the linked Gforth page to determine what implementation work is being proposed. The issue does not name any repository files, tests, entry points, scope, or completion criteria, so those would need to be established before implementation can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 8
- Avg merge
- 1d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from exercism/forth
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
danielmiessler/LifeOS#2218 ·
-
docs(agents): strengthen the no-backslash-escaped-backticks rule with an issue-creation example Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
technical-debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
ll7/robot_sf_ll7#9560 ·
-
package-update
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
oSoWoSo/vOid_Community_repOsitory#148 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100