Evaluate splitting off some auxiliary packages
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- distributed-systems
Research direction
Start by mapping the dacluster IPython cluster-management code and the engine namespace-management code, then trace their dependencies on DistArray. Determine viable package boundaries, external-use cases, and compatibility requirements before proposing a split; done means the scope and migration path are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I think at least
- ipcluster management (dacluster), and
- namespace management on the engines
could potentially be their own packages, useful outside DistArray.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from enthought/distarray
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in enthought/distarray
Similar issues
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
simonw/sqlite-utils#872 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100