Better support for structured arrays

Open
#433 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python

Research direction

Start by examining structured dtype behavior at the Local level and the existing DistArray indexing path. Check how field names are represented and add focused coverage for structured dtypes, including indexing particular fields by name on DistArray. Done means the supported cases work consistently and the tests document the behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement

We haven't tested DistArrays with structured dtypes yet. I would guess that it mostly works at the Local level, but we definitely don't support indexing into particular "fields" by name on the DistArray side yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
5
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from enthought/distarray

All issues in enthought/distarray

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.