Rule author
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
Start by comparing the rules in this repository with the original author's updated rules at https://github.com/pfultz2/cppcheck-rules, using EmptyIfStatement as the stated example. Done means bringing the existing rules up to date for cases such as nested parentheses and deciding which additional rules from the source repository belong here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I am the original author. All these rules come from this repo:
https://github.com/pfultz2/cppcheck-rules
Except the rules are out of date. These rules have been updated to make them more robust. For example the EmptyIfStatement rule checks for nested parenthesis: if (\([^()]*(?-1)*[^()]*\)) { } but the one in the repo is much older and does not.
There are also additional rules available.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
QuantStack/git2cpp#187 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
mlcommons/mobile_app_open#1182 ·
-
Needs-Triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
microsoft/winget-cli#6547 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·