[information-architecture] Issue Triage docs place GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN under `with` instead of `secrets`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 88/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Read docs/workflows/gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage.md around lines 33–38 and 62–73, then compare it with gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage/example.yml around lines 24–29. Confirm that the documentation’s configuration example matches the example file, with GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN represented in the appropriate block. Done means the docs no longer place this secret under with and the two examples are consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Information Architecture Findings
1. GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN is shown in the wrong configuration block
Area: Action placement
Component(s):
docs/workflows/gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage.mdgh-agent-workflows/issue-triage/example.yml
Problem: The Issue Triage docs describe GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN as a secret, but the docs example places it under the commented with: block. Users following the docs are likely to put the token in the wrong place, which makes setup flow inconsistent and obscures where this control belongs.
Evidence:
docs/workflows/gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage.md:33-38documentsGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENin the Secrets table.docs/workflows/gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage.md:62-73showsGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENinside the commentedwith:section (nosecrets:block in that snippet).gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage/example.yml:24-29shows the same token under a commented#secrets:block, which is the expected placement.
Suggested improvement: In docs/workflows/gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage.md, move the token example lines into a commented secrets: block directly below with: to match the actual example file and reduce setup ambiguity.
Suggested Actions
- Update the Issue Triage docs snippet so
GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENis shown undersecrets:instead ofwith:. - Keep the docs snippet aligned with
gh-agent-workflows/issue-triage/example.ymlfor ongoing consistency.
Duplicate check
This finding is distinct from previously filed IA issues in /tmp/previous-findings.json (which focus on taxonomy/discovery grouping and missing workflow discovery). This report is specifically about misplacement of a secret control within the Issue Triage configuration example.
What is this? | From workflow: Trigger Information Architecture
Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 11
- Forks
- 16
- Avg merge
- 11h 16m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 29
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from elastic/ai-github-actions
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
elastic/ai-github-actions#2142 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
elastic/ai-github-actions#2132 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
elastic/ai-github-actions#2127 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
elastic/ai-github-actions#2126 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
elastic/ai-github-actions#2121 ·
All issues in elastic/ai-github-actions
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100