Associations need to be used with accounting for weight

Open
#3 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
55/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Start with the linked efficiency-analysis sections in _episodes/03-analysis.md, then inspect the referenced location in _extras/branch_dictionary.md. Update the tutorial guidance so associations account for weight and the largest-weight association is used for typical analyses. Done means both relevant documentation locations consistently communicate this guidance.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Dominant language
C
Stars
0
Forks
1
Avg merge
1d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from eic/tutorial-analysis

All issues in eic/tutorial-analysis

Similar issues

More C issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.