Create static binary tgz's for containerd
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- dockerfile
- Domain
- build-system, release
Research direction
The issue body is empty, so first inspect the repository's existing packaging and static-binary entry points and determine how containerd artifacts are currently built. Done means producing static containerd tgz archives through the project's packaging workflow, with their expected contents and build process documented or verified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue has no description.
- Dominant language
- Dockerfile
- Stars
- 35
- Forks
- 38
- Avg merge
- 1d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from docker/packaging
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
area/pkg/agent area/pkg/buildx area/pkg/compose area/pkg/containerd area/pkg/docker-cli area/pkg/docker-engine area/pkg/model
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in docker/packaging
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
elastic/gradle-plugins#157 ·
-
Documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
cake-build/cake#5024 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
web-infra-dev/rspack#15847 ·
-
accepted bug wg/developer-experience-ecosystem
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
vllm-project/semantic-router#4062 · 2 comments ·