💟 Adopting SponsorLink in v1.2
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- developer-experience
Research direction
Read the SponsorLink v2 and privacy statement linked in the issue, then review the repository's current project and build entry points. The issue names no implementation target or acceptance test, so confirm the intended integration and completion criteria before starting.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
In order to improve the long-term sustainability of this (and other) projects, we'll be adopting SponsorLink v2.
Please get familiar with it, read the privacy statement and raise any doubts related to it in the SponsorLink repo itself.
All of SponsorLink is OSS too.
What this means for you:
- If you're not a sponsor (or you haven't synchronized your sponsorship), you will get a IDE-only warning reminding you that the project needs sponsorship.
- CLI or CI builds will never check for sponsorship.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 13
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
type/automation type/tech-debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
t/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
ci-failure-cause test-failure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
area:auth FE mvp P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
klasolsson81/jobbliggaren#1788 ·
