rtk-ai/rtk

Feature request: Add RTK equivalents for bun/bunx commands

Open

#1.735 geöffnet am 6. Mai 2026

Auf GitHub ansehen
 (1 Kommentar) (0 Reaktionen) (0 zugewiesene Personen)Rust (2.914 Forks)batch import
area:clienhancementhelp wantedplatform:macospriority:medium

Repository-Metriken

Stars
 (48.085 Stars)
PR-Merge-Metriken
 (Durchschn. Merge 11T 1h) (45 gemergte PRs in 30 T)

Beschreibung

Summary

rtk discover flagged a large number of unhandled bun/bunx commands that could benefit from RTK equivalents. These are the most-missed savings opportunities after the already-handled npm/npx commands.

Top unhandled bun commands (last 30 days)

Command Count Example
bunx tsc 588 bunx tsc --noEmit > /tmp/...
bun run 524 bun run lib/render.cjs ...
bun install 98 bun install 2>&1
bunx oxlint 74 bunx oxlint --deny-warnings 2>&1
bun x 73 bun x oxfmt src/...
bunx oxfmt 65 bunx oxfmt . 2>&1
bun test 40 bun test src/...
bunx 36 bunx @expo/fingerprint . 2>&1
bun add 32 bun add sharp 2>&1

Suggested mappings

RTK already handles the npm/npx equivalents:

  • npm runrtk npm
  • npx tscrtk tsc
  • npx jestrtk jest

Similar mappings for bun would be straightforward:

  • bun runrtk bun (or reuse rtk npm)
  • bunx tscrtk tsc (same tool, different runner)
  • bun testrtk jest / rtk bun test
  • bun install / bun addrtk bun
  • bunxrtk bunx or fold into rtk npx

Impact

Based on the discover output, these commands represent a significant portion of unhandled sessions. Adding bun support would extend RTK's token savings to projects using Bun as their JS runtime/package manager.

Environment

  • Reported via rtk discover
  • macOS (darwin)

Contributor Guide