exaloop/codon

static compilation option?

Offen

#82 geöffnet am 10.12.2022

 (8 Kommentare) (9 Reaktionen) (0 zugewiesene Personen)C++ (492 Forks)batch import
enhancementhelp wanted

Repository-Metriken

Stars
 (13.667 Sterne)
PR-Merge-Metriken
 (Durchschn. Merge 5T 10h) (3 gemergte PRs in 30 T)

Beschreibung

After I successfully compiled a test python program using codon build <demo.py>, on macOS Monterey (intel), I checked the dependencies as per the following:

$ otool -L demo
demo:
	@rpath/libcodonrt.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
	@rpath/libomp.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0)
	/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1319.0.0)
	/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.11)

The two @rpath dependencies, libcodonrt.dylib and libomp.dylib are included in the codon distribution, they are 1.2M and 772K respectively so not so large.

Is there any thought to having static libraries of these two dependencies available so one may statically compile the executable instead to make it more relocatable?

Contributor Guide