Microsoft/TypeScript

Inconsistent behaviour of `-?`

Open

#59.948 geöffnet am 12. Sept. 2024

Auf GitHub ansehen
 (8 Kommentare) (0 Reaktionen) (0 zugewiesene Personen)TypeScript (6.726 Forks)batch import
BugDomain: Mapped TypesHelp Wanted

Repository-Metriken

Stars
 (48.455 Stars)
PR-Merge-Metriken
 (Durchschn. Merge 6T 17h) (9 gemergte PRs in 30 T)

Beschreibung

🔎 Search Terms

optional mapped type

🕗 Version & Regression Information

  • This changed between versions 5.4.5 and 5.5.4

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?exactOptionalPropertyTypes=true#code/C4TwDgpgBA8mwEsD2A7AhgGwCpIKouRQHUFgALfAEwgDMEUJKAeLAPigF4oBvAKCgFQA2gGko9KAGsIIJDShYAugC4FUCAA9gEFJQDOUAEoQAxkgBOzEQBoFoxa36DnAfjsjFT5wNVZ7UAB8oAFddWnpGXgBfXl5QSCgASRRtcwBbBEoENG1OWHhCTBx8QhJyKnCGZm4oNBdVPWBzegBzKCj2AHpOnlr6qEbmlDag0Oo6Kva48GgAGVIIc0w8mrqGptbAkLCJxnaoboG0NOh46DQDZNSMrJyIWLOjCD0ARjzjAEdghHNGJivFjdstouj1Vushm0Yo9jHoAEzvCBfH5-eapTCg3poCGbUY7CKUdpAA

💻 Code

type OptionalToUnionWithUndefined<T> = {
    [K in keyof T]: T extends Record<K, T[K]>
        ? T[K]
        : T[K] | undefined
}

type Intermediate = OptionalToUnionWithUndefined<{ a?: string }> // { a?: string | undefined }
type Literal = { a?: string | undefined } // same type as Intermediate

type Res1 = Required<Intermediate> // { a: string }
type Res2 = Required<Literal> // { a: string | undefined }

🙁 Actual behavior

Res1 and Res2 are different types

🙂 Expected behavior

they should be the same because the inputs are

Additional information about the issue

This issue may share the cause with #59902

Contributor Guide