Microsoft/TypeScript

Nested generic calls don't inherit outer inferences when their return types are intersections containing functions

Open

#58.833 geöffnet am 12. Juni 2024

Auf GitHub ansehen
 (0 Kommentare) (1 Reaktion) (0 zugewiesene Personen)TypeScript (6.726 Forks)batch import
Domain: IntersectionHelp WantedPossible Improvement

Repository-Metriken

Stars
 (48.455 Stars)
PR-Merge-Metriken
 (Durchschn. Merge 6T 17h) (9 gemergte PRs in 30 T)

Beschreibung

🔎 Search Terms

generic call inference intersection return type

🕗 Version & Regression Information

  • This is the behavior in every version I tried

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?ts=5.6.0-dev.20240611#code/JYOwLgpgTgZghgYwgAgMIHsQ2AcwDwAqAfMgN4CwAUMsgppAB5gBcyBA3FTaAG7oDWEVhWo1kACgasCASlZ9gAE06iaEBhAStJ0mcgC8JBcq7IAvirNUqizQBs4UFDACuIBGGCZaTuJEJE4nRYuKwYIfjEcsjGKjb2js5uHl4gyAC2AJ4AkiB8ggBCUAIQIAHiwMLI6praUmx6hjHoSubRIjQ6DfItJpRmyABkyGCZAA4Q6DDIwHGUCL6Q4h209OosZKtuGwDM5gA0prwlrFm5+RBFJSDLpmoaWhIMjSQrYsgMd2IA9N-IAHoAfi+NAYADo6NswWB0AAxYAaRTiABMMhU7zMh1EZhkWJxc1sCAcTmQrncnm8ZzyJXKlU2NUeXVkBiMvTawlMTOisVMDLquhZzSUljmCwgfggt1EwUYG1IW3ArD2mKO1MEpxyaslb2qDzqLzIII+Rt+AOBqjE4Mh4GhcIRECRqPRYhV2NxVHxVCAA

💻 Code

interface Config<T> {
  context: T;
  invoke: {
    (x: T): void;
    exec: (x: T) => void;
  };
}

declare function create<T>(config: Config<T>): void;

declare function myInvokeBroken<T>(i: { exec: (x: T) => void }): {
  (x: T): void;
} & typeof i;

create({
  context: { count: 3 },
  invoke: myInvokeBroken({
    exec: (x) => {
      x
      // ^?
      x.count.toFixed(2);
    },
  }),
});

declare function myInvoke<T>(i: { exec: (x: T) => void }): {
  (x: T): void;
  exec: (x: T) => void;
};

create({
  context: { count: 3 },
  invoke: myInvoke({
    exec: (x) => {
      x
      // ^?
      x.count.toFixed(2);
    },
  }),
});

🙁 Actual behavior

x doesn't get contextually typed based on the outer inferences in the myInvokeBroken example

🙂 Expected behavior

I would expect myInvokeBroken and myInvoke to work here in the same way. Their return types are the same. It's only that myInvokeBroken is using an intersection in its return type while myInvoke isn't

Additional information about the issue

No response

Contributor Guide