[coverage] Conformance findings: METADATA-037
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- sql, typescript
Research direction
Start with the getColumns path in databricks-sql-nodejs and the METADATA-037 expected-failure described in the coverage PR; compare its SEA result with the Thrift result and read the reference driver PR for context. Done means a bare "%" catalog filter returns the fixture table's columns on SEA instead of zero rows, with the conformance test passing.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs.
Each is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT behavior and stays red until this driver is fixed.
- METADATA-037: SEA/kernel path does not expand a bare "%" catalog filter to match-all: getColumns(catalogName:'%', fixture schema+table) returns 0 rows on SEA vs the fixture table's columns on Thrift, because the catalog is forwarded as a literal identifier (cross-protocol row-set divergence, same class as ADBC issue 593)
Reference driver PR: https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/594
Coverage PR (reproducing xfail tests): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1009
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 36
- Forks
- 50
- Avg merge
- 13h 46m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
engineer-bot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs#274 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
All issues in databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
ontola/atomic-server#1625 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
melgarafael/DeskcommCRM#1451 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
bug via-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bot:ai-assisted component:compact-js status:untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
midnightntwrk/midnight-sdk#403 ·