Developer partnerships with smart contract security auditors

Open
#74 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
20/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
blockchain
Domain
security

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are mentioned. Start by reviewing the proposed client benefits, referral rewards, and conflict-of-interest question; done would mean a decided partnership approach or a documented decision.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Comms

Clients may request a smart contract security audit performed by a third party. dOrg does not have a partnership with any organizations that provide smart contract security auditing services. Can dOrg benefit from arranging one or more partnerships?

I imagine potential benefits of such partnerships might include:

  • Simpler process for our clients
  • Discounted auditing services for our clients

We could seek referral rewards/fees for dOrg as well. Can that create a conflict of interest?

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
17
Forks
12
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from dOrgTech/docs

All issues in dOrgTech/docs

Similar issues

More Security issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.