[const.wrap.class] The deleted `operator,` overload has meaningless `constexpr` and `noexcept`

Open
#8,951 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
55/100
Issue type
Refactor
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Quiet
Tech stack
cpp, tex
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Locate the const.wrap.class wording in the draft and review the changes from P3978R3 before editing. Remove the meaningless constexpr and noexcept from the deleted operator, then verify the wording remains correct after that change is merged.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

P3-Other

They don't seem to make sense for a deleted overload. Perhaps it's better to remove them (after merging the PR for P3978R3).

Dominant language
TeX
Stars
221
Forks
813
Avg merge
17h 45m
Merged PRs (30d)
34

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from cplusplus/draft

All issues in cplusplus/draft

Similar issues

More Documentation issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.