[BOT ISSUE] Add databricks-gpt-5-4-mini and databricks-gemini-3-6-flash (Databricks)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 85/100
Research direction
Start by opening model_list.json and comparing nearby Databricks entries with the existing gpt-5.4-mini and gemini-3.6-flash records. Add the two missing catalog entries using the verified metadata in the issue, then confirm both model IDs appear in model_list.json with the expected provider and token limits.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Two models listed on the Databricks Foundation Model APIs docs for pay-per-token serverless inference are missing from the model catalog: databricks-gpt-5-4-mini and databricks-gemini-3-6-flash.
Gap
Both base models exist in the catalog (gpt-5.4-mini and gemini-3.6-flash), but the Databricks-specific endpoint names do not. Other models in the same series already have Databricks variants (e.g., databricks-gpt-5-4, databricks-gpt-5-4-nano, databricks-gemini-3-5-flash).
Source verification
databricks-gpt-5-4-mini
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Model ID | databricks-gpt-5-4-mini |
Databricks Foundation Model docs |
| Base model | gpt-5.4-mini |
Already in model_list.json (line 172) |
| Context window | 272,000 input / 128,000 output | Consistent with databricks-gpt-5-4-nano and Azure docs |
| Pricing | Not published per-model by Databricks | Skipped per provider constraint |
databricks-gemini-3-6-flash
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Model ID | databricks-gemini-3-6-flash |
Databricks Foundation Model docs |
| Base model | gemini-3.6-flash |
Already in model_list.json (line 11122) |
| Context window | 1,048,576 input / 65,536 output | Consistent with databricks-gemini-3-5-flash |
| Pricing | Not published per-model by Databricks | Skipped per provider constraint |
Cross-source verification
- Both models confirmed on Databricks official documentation as available for pay-per-token serverless inference
- Base model
gpt-5.4-miniconfirmed on OpenAI docs and OpenAI pricing - Base model
gemini-3.6-flashconfirmed on Google AI docs and Google pricing - Not present in
model_list.json(grep confirmed zero matches for both IDs) - No existing GitHub issue covers these Databricks endpoints
- Specs derived from existing Databricks entries in the same model families (
databricks-gpt-5-4-nano,databricks-gemini-3-5-flash)
Notes
- Databricks does not publish stable per-model pricing — pricing fields are omitted per provider constraint
- Databricks entries use
format: "openai"(not the base model's native format) since Databricks exposes an OpenAI-compatible API reasoningis included fordatabricks-gemini-3-6-flashfor consistency with the existingdatabricks-gemini-3-5-flashentry
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 410
- Forks
- 65
- Avg merge
- 18h 29m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 51
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy
-
bot-issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy#1271 · 1 comment ·
-
autofix-blocked
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy#1269 · 1 comment ·
-
autofix-blocked bot-issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy#1257 · 1 comment ·
-
autofix-blocked bot-issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy#1238 · 1 comment ·
-
autofix-blocked bot-issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy#1233 · 1 comment ·
All issues in braintrustdata/braintrust-proxy
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
bug clawsweeper:linked-pr-open clawsweeper:needs-live-repro clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr impact:message-loss issue-rating: 🐚 platinum hermit P2 regression
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
fullcalendar/fullcalendar#8106 ·