Boost.Predef should provide a way to detect WASM
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100
Research direction
The issue names no target files or tests. Start by reproducing the listed em++ macro output and inspect how Boost.Predef currently exposes platform or compiler detection. Done means Boost.Predef provides a documented WASM detection result for the shown macro environment, with coverage for that case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Relevant macros gathered from echo | em++ -dM -E -x c++ -:
#define EMSCRIPTEN 1
#define __EMSCRIPTEN__ 1
#define __wasm 1
#define __wasm32 1
#define __wasm32__ 1
#define __wasm__ 1
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 56
- Forks
- 87
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from boostorg/predef
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
unique endian macros Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
bug enhancement
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
hapostgres/pg_auto_failover#1190 ·
-
docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
P3 sonic-vpp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#29662 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
spack/spack-packages#6586 ·