Any interest in a reference card?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp, latex
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the linked Spirit 2 reference card PDF and the Parser project documentation to determine what material a Parser card would cover. No source files or tests are named, so first clarify the card’s scope and format with maintainers. Done means an agreed reference-card proposal or a completed LaTeX reference card, depending on that decision.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
In 2016 I created a reference card for Spirit 2 with LaTeX.
Is there any interest in such a reference card for Parser?
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 182
- Forks
- 28
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from boostorg/parser
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 20/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100