x86 inline assembly should provide an alternative for Intel syntax
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- operating-systems
Research direction
Open include/boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp at line 174 and inspect the existing x86 inline-assembly operand template. Update that template to provide the Intel-syntax alternative shown in the issue; the work is done when the assembly supports both operand-order syntaxes without changing the atomic operation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Instead of https://github.com/boostorg/interprocess/blob/a0c5a8ff176434c9024d4540ce092a2eebb8c5c3/include/boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp#L174
we should have
"xadd { %1, %0 | %0, %1 }":
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 185
- Forks
- 131
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from boostorg/interprocess
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
boostorg/interprocess#279 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
boostorg/interprocess#274 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
boostorg/interprocess#268 · 4 comments ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
boostorg/interprocess#262 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 32/100
boostorg/interprocess#253 ·
All issues in boostorg/interprocess
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
NVIDIA/cuda-samples#453 ·