Is this function designed intentionally? boost::date_time::c_time::gmtime doesn't touch the result pointer passed.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start with include/boost/date_time/c_time.hpp at lines 109-120 and reproduce the behavior on Windows with MSVC 16.11.7. Determine whether gmtime is intended to populate the supplied std::tm pointer, then verify the documented or implemented contract and add coverage for the observed behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
inline static std::tm* gmtime(const std::time_t* t, std::tm* result);
I assume this function will change the result pointer by filling the struct; but it doesn't;
Windows 10;
MSVC 16.11.7
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 70
- Forks
- 99
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from boostorg/date_time
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in boostorg/date_time
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
NVIDIA/cuda-samples#453 ·