Remove somewhat irrelevant article links
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- content
Research direction
Search the repository for the four listed article URLs and inspect the surrounding homepage content. Confirm which links are currently presented and whether the Hive.blog suggestion is within scope. Done means the irrelevant links are no longer displayed and any replacement has been explicitly decided.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The following links are pretty much entirely irrelevant to Bitshares:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2017/11/08/waves-set-to-become-fastest-decentralized-blockchain-platform-globally/
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/31/a-blockchain-start-up-just-raised-4-billion-without-a-live-product.html
https://news.bitcoin.com/top-10-pow-dominance-evaporates-9-years-later-only-two-proof-of-work-coins-will-remain-after-the-merge/
They mention Bitshares in passing comparison, not exclusively focusing on Bitshares, effectively promoting other coins instead of BTS.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-dollar-pegged-stablecoin-bitusd-114939384.html
The above article is also about bitUSD instability with OpenLedger years ago, why would we direct prospective users to old news that paints Bitshares in poor light? lol
Maybe display content fetched from Hive.blog/created/bitshares which has more than a dollar reward?
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from bitshares/bitshares.github.io
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
bitshares/bitshares.github.io#8 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 48/100
bitshares/bitshares.github.io#7 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 38/100
All issues in bitshares/bitshares.github.io
Similar issues
-
curation good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
amponce/archive-movie-browser#186 ·
-
Link Checker Report Openautomated issue report
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
Ecosystem: ClawMetry — the Qwen Code reader is now free and open source (follow-up to #9294 / #9338) Opencategory/integration priority/P3 scope/documentation status/ready-for-human type/feature-request
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
TheOdinProject/curriculum#31408 ·