Comparison between Tulsi and XCHammer

Open
#233 1 comment 8 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Domain
build-system, documentation

Research direction

Start by reviewing how XCHammer generates Xcode projects from a Bazel workspace and compare that with Tulsi. The issue names no files, tests, documentation location, or comparison criteria; done would be a published comparison that helps users choose between the two tools.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

As these seem to be the two leading choices for project generation from Bazel, it would be great to have a comparison of them to help people make a decision.

Dominant language
Swift
Stars
314
Forks
45
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from bazel-xcode/xchammer

All issues in bazel-xcode/xchammer

Similar issues

More Swift issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.