Consider Sphinx for Documentation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the repository's current documentation setup and evaluating Sphinx; done would require a decided documentation approach and an agreed implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Consider using Sphinx (http://sphinx-doc.org/) for Documetnation purposes?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 29
- Forks
- 17
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from azavea/python-sld
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
azavea/python-sld#16 · 2 comments ·
-
as_sld function Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
azavea/python-sld#15 · 1 comment ·
All issues in azavea/python-sld
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100