Lifecycle policies for Lambda Resources
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- aws
- Domain
- cloud
Research direction
This is an exploratory request about lifecycle policies for versioned Lambda resources, including maximum-version, last-invoked, timestamp, status, and dependency rules. No files, tests, implementation entry points, or completion criteria are identified; the issue currently seeks community feedback rather than defining a startable change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Note
- Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
- Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do * not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in providing additional feedback, please leave a comment
Description
We are exploring supporting lifecycle policies for versioned Lambda resources. With this feature, customers could delete multiple versions at once via a retention policy. We are exploring "max versions", "last invoked", and other qualifiers to automatically delete versions that do not match the policy when you create a new version or update a resource.
Additional context
- What types of actions would you want to take, for example, label a function as deprecated, delete a layer version, block invokes, etc.?
- What types of timestamp based rules would you write, for example, 1 year after function version create date do x.
- Are there any other attributes you would want to reference in your policy?
- Do you need to write policies to delete resources based on the status of other resources, for example, delete all function versions that reference outdated runtimes?
- How would you want to handle dependencies for example, would you want to automatically delete function versions associated with a specific layer version?
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 196
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from aws/aws-lambda-roadmap
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#101 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#100 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#97 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#96 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#95 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
All issues in aws/aws-lambda-roadmap
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
bug needs-triage service/elbv2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#50100 · 1 comment ·