Feature request: Include/Exclude Interface for AWS Lambda Builders
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- aws, python
- Domain
- build-system, cloud
Research direction
Start by reviewing issues #430 and #185 and pull requests #431 and #424 to understand the existing include and exclude proposals. Produce an approved design document covering the interface, its configuration or JSON RPC location, runtime-general behavior, and runtimes where it should be ignored.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe your idea/feature/enhancement
There are currently two opposing feature requests that go hand-in-hand. One is to include files/directories in the resultant build package, and one is for exclusion. Both of these are genuine use-cases across various runtimes, and, as such, we believe should be handled together though a common include/exclude interface for the Lambda Builders library.
Include: Issue #430, PR #431
Exclude: Issue #185, PR #424
This should start with an initial design document, and once approved, can be implemented. The important notes for the design to address:
- What does the interface look like? e.g. is part of the JSON RPC, is it through a configuration file, etc?
- How to make the implementation general across runtimes. Are there any runtimes for which this feature should be ignored?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 381
- Forks
- 162
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from aws/aws-lambda-builders
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
aws/aws-lambda-builders#925 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 64/100
aws/aws-lambda-builders#924 · 1 comment ·
-
Bug: PythonUvBuilder fails to build app with dependencies on editable installs in the workspace Openstage/needs-triage
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-builders#892 ·
-
stage/needs-triage type/feature
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
aws/aws-lambda-builders#839 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
area/build contributors/good-first-issue contributors/welcome type/feature
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
aws/aws-lambda-builders#831 · 3 comments ·
All issues in aws/aws-lambda-builders
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#172 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main Openarea: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness#4207 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ClickHouse/clickhouse-connect#1057 ·