arxiv-vanity/engrafo

Recursive include of the input file in the output folder

Open

#182 opened on Oct 30, 2017

View on GitHub
 (5 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)HTML (990 stars) (96 forks)batch import
good first issuehelp wantedtype/bug

Description

Hi, I tried engrafo locally (using docker), with

sudo docker run -v "$(pwd)":/workdir -w /workdir arxivvanity/engrafo engrafo -o ./output/ ./input/test.tex

and somehow the content of the ./input/ folder gets copied in ./output/, which also contains a ./output folder with the tex files and all the figures, and recursively (for quite a deep recursive include, for example output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output /output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/input.bib is here... (see attached file for the listing, du.log)

Any idea to solve this bug?

Generating a simple output from a 5-page article took 556 Mo on my disk. Just crazy...

Contributor guide

Tech stack
pythondockershell
Domain
clitooling
Issue type
bug
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
1-3 hours
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
stale
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
mostly clear
Prerequisites
Docker basicsLaTeX basics
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
40
Research direction
Investigate the Docker volume mount and the engrafo output handling code. The issue suggests that the input folder content is recursively copied into the output folder. Check if the tool's o option or the Docker volume mount causes the input directory to be included in the output. Look at the engrafo script (likely a Python script) and the Dockerfile for how the output directory is treated. Also examine the file copying logic in the tool's source code to prevent recursive inclusion.
Recursive include of the input file in the output folder · arxiv-vanity/engrafo#182 | Good First Issue