Assessment of the difficulty in porting CPU architecture for arrayfire
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points and asks only for community opinions about CPU-architecture porting complexity. Start by reviewing the issue body and the repository’s architecture-related code, then establish what evidence would support or reject the stated assessment; done means a documented community assessment rather than a code change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hello everyone! I am working on implementing a tool to assess the complexity of CPU architecture porting. It primarily focuses on RISC-V architecture porting. In fact, it can be estimated on average across various architectures.My focus is on the overall workload and difficulty of transplantation in the past and future.As part of my dataset, I have collected the arrayfire project. I would like to gather community opinions to support my assessment. I appreciate your help and response! Based on scanning tools, the porting complexity is determined to be simple, with a small amount of code related to the CPU architecture in the project. (referring to the overall workload from adapting the project to a specific architecture to achieving full functionality on that architecture). Is this assessment accurate? I look forward to your help and response.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 555
- Avg merge
- 1h 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from arrayfire/arrayfire
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
All issues in arrayfire/arrayfire
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
duckdb/duckdb-wasm#2258 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
objectionary/eo-graphs#75 ·
-
Coarray integration tests carry no LABELS, so run_tests.py silently skips them under every backend Opencoarray
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
FISCO-BCOS/FISCO-BCOS#5642 ·