How to generate an array according to the rules defined by oneself?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
Research direction
The issue provides no repository file, test, or entry point to inspect. Start by locating the Haskell array-generation API and determine whether the requested Int -> Int -> Float function is already supported; done would require a documented, agreed approach for generating an array from that rule.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
How to generate an array according to the rules defined by oneself?
I have a function like func:: Int->Int->Float, which represents calculating values based on index
- Dominant language
- Haskell
- Stars
- 60
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
documentation enhancement ops
arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell#48 · 1 assignee ·
-
ArrayFire benchmarks Openenhancement good first issue help wanted
arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell#38 · 10 comments · 2 assignees ·
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted question
arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell#34 · 1 comment · 2 assignees ·
All issues in arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
enhancement tricorder
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
zip-archive-0.5 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
commercialhaskell/stackage#8124 · 1 comment ·