Integration Tests Not Properly Mocked
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- graphql, node.js, typescript
Research direction
Start by running the integration tests with networking disabled and inspect the example that assigns launchAPI.get, then trace which RESTDataSource method handles the launch lookup. The issue names no files or test command; done should mean the integration tests pass offline without requesting api.spacexdata.com and still return the expected rocket data.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I followed the integration tests example pattern in my own app.
// mock the datasources' underlying fetch methods, whether that's a REST
// lookup in the RESTDataSource or the store query in the Sequelize datasource
launchAPI.get = jest.fn(() => [mockLaunchResponse]);
However I noticed it was still making api calls to the rest endpoint. I then cloned this repo turned off my wifi and ran the integration tests and sure enough I got an error.
errors": Array [
+ Object {
+ "extensions": Object {
+ "code": "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR",
+ "exception": Object {
+ "code": "ENOTFOUND",
+ "errno": "ENOTFOUND",
+ "message": "request to https://api.spacexdata.com/v2/launches?flight_number=30 failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND api.spacexdata.com api.spacexdata.com:443",
+ "type": "system",
+ },
},
- "rocket": Object {
- "type": "FT",
- },
+ "locations": Array [
+ Object {
+ "column": 3,
+ "line": 2,
+ },
+ ],
+ "message": "request to https://api.spacexdata.com/v2/launches?flight_number=30 failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND api.spacexdata.com api.spacexdata.com:443",
+ "path": Array [
+ "launch",
+ ],
This tells me that launchAPI.get is not being properly mocked. Which I think would make sense as there is no launchAPI.get however there is a launchAPI.prototype.get however that doesn't seem to work when I change the tests to that.
Any ideas?
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 808
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apollographql/fullstack-tutorial
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
investigate
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
documentation
apollographql/fullstack-tutorial#285 · 3 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
investigate
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
apollographql/fullstack-tutorial#255 · 2 reactions ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
apollographql/fullstack-tutorial#254 · 2 comments ·
All issues in apollographql/fullstack-tutorial
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
bug v2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2458 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
railmapgen/rmp-gallery#4068 ·
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability status: needs triage 🕵️♀️
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
carbon-design-system/ibm-products#9907 ·