Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

AlexNet bacward shape missmatch + ReLu return a tuple

Open
#681 7 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python

Research direction

Start with the supplied AlexNet implementation and reproduce the failure in backward_and_update on CPU with Singa 3.0.0.rc1, then compare the reported linear-layer shapes with the VGG16 case. Trace the ReLU return value and backward shape mapping; done when the models reach the first linear layer with matching dimensions and ReLU has a documented, consistent return shape.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hi,

I have implemented AlexNet in singa but I obtain an error during the backward_and_update instruction. I am using Singa 3.0.0.rc1 on cpu.

This is my AlexNet implementation:
`from singa import autograd
from singa import module
from singa import opt

all = ['AlexNet', 'alexnet']

class AlexNet(module.Module):
def init(self, num_classes=1000):
super(AlexNet, self).init()
# 12 sur GPU donc 6 & 6
self.features1 = [
autograd.Conv2d(3,64,kernel_size=11,stride=4,padding=2),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2),
autograd.Conv2d(64,192,kernel_size=5,padding=2),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2),
autograd.Conv2d(192,384,kernel_size=3,padding=1),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.Conv2d(384, 256,kernel_size=3,padding=1),
autograd.ReLU()
]
self.features2 = [
autograd.Conv2d(256, 256,kernel_size=3,padding=1),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2)
]
self.avgpool = autograd.AvgPool2d(6, stride=1)
self.flatten = autograd.Flatten()
self.classifier = [
autograd.Dropout(),
autograd.Linear(256 * 6 * 6, 4096),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.Dropout(),
autograd.Linear(4096, 4096),
autograd.ReLU(),
autograd.Linear(4096, num_classes)
]
self.optimizer = opt.SGD(lr=0.001, momentum=0.9)
def loss(self, out, ty):
return autograd.softmax_cross_entropy(out, ty)
def optim(self, loss, dist_option, spars):
if dist_option == 'fp32':
self.optimizer.backward_and_update(loss)
elif dist_option == 'fp16':
self.optimizer.backward_and_update_half(loss)
elif dist_option == 'partialUpdate':
self.optimizer.backward_and_partial_update(loss)
elif dist_option == 'sparseTopK':
self.optimizer.backward_and_sparse_update(loss, topK=True, spars=spars)
elif dist_option == 'sparseThreshold':
self.optimizer.backward_and_sparse_update(loss, topK=False, spars=spars)
def forward(self, x):
for (i,layers) in enumerate([self.features1, self.features2, [ self.avgpool,self.flatten ] , self.classifier]):
for (j,fn) in enumerate(layers):
x = fn(x)
if(type(x) is tuple):# FIXME I have to do that because of a bug in Singa? (ReLU)
x = x[0]
return x

def alexnet(**kwargs):
return AlexNet(**kwargs)
`
And I get : AssertionError: ('shape mismatch', (9216, 4096), (256, 4096))
Which is my first linear layer : 256 * 6 * 6, 4096

When I use my VGG16 implementation, I got a similar error :
AssertionError: ('shape mismatch', (25088, 4096), (512, 4096))

It seems that the backward operation does not map the correct shape to the corresponding layer.

Moreover, the ReLu class return a 1-tuple containing a Tensor. Is it intended or is it a bug?

Dominant language
C++
Stars
3.6k
Forks
1.3k
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from apache/singa

All issues in apache/singa

Similar issues

More C++ issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.