[BUG] sim/module: ar output the warning message from ci
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- build-system
Research direction
Start by rerunning the linked CI job for the sim/module configuration and inspect the build output around the ar warning. Trace which build step invokes ar with no archive members, then verify that the configuration builds without the warning and usage text.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Description / Steps to reproduce the issue
please see https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/actions/runs/11381576984/job/31663367795?pr=2737:
====================================================================================
Configuration/Tool: sim/module
2024-10-17 10:15:50
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleaning...
Configuring...
Building NuttX...
ar: no archive members specified
usage: ar -d [-TLsv] archive file ...
ar -m [-TLsv] archive file ...
ar -m [-abiTLsv] position archive file ...
ar -p [-TLsv] archive [file ...]
ar -q [-cTLsv] archive file ...
ar -r [-cuTLsv] archive file ...
ar -r [-abciuTLsv] position archive file ...
ar -t [-TLsv] archive [file ...]
ar -x [-ouTLsv] archive [file ...]
Normalize sim/module
On which OS does this issue occur?
[OS: Linux]
What is the version of your OS?
Ubuntu
NuttX Version
master
Issue Architecture
[Arch: all]
Issue Area
[Area: Binfmt]
Verification
- I have verified before submitting the report.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 465
- Forks
- 782
- Avg merge
- 3d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 44
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apache/nuttx-apps
-
Type: Enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
apache/nuttx-apps#3620 · 5 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Type: Bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
apache/nuttx-apps#3634 · 1 comment ·
-
apache/nuttx-apps#3436 · 1 assignee ·
-
[FEATURE/SECURITY/BUG] Add hash key validation to check the files downloaded from external projects OpenType: Bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
apache/nuttx-apps#3418 ·
-
Type: Bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
apache/nuttx-apps#3407 · 14 comments ·
All issues in apache/nuttx-apps
Similar issues
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
hapostgres/pg_auto_failover#1190 ·
-
docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
P3 sonic-vpp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#29662 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
spack/spack-packages#6586 ·