Improve loading of 3P scripts

Open
#21,229 3 comments 5 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@clydin is already working on this.

Since Jul 29, 2021.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Description

area: @angular-devkit/build-angular devkit/build-angular:browser feature

🚀 Feature request

Command (mark with an x)
  • new
  • build
  • serve
  • test
  • e2e
  • generate
  • add
  • update
  • lint
  • extract-i18n
  • run
  • config
  • help
  • version
  • doc
Description

Loading third-party scripts in a suboptimal way can cause performance regressions. A typical example is adding an SDK as script tag directly to the page head, which will block the loading of first-party scripts and delay hydration/CSR if done incorrectly.

Describe the solution you'd like

Expand scripts the functionality already available in angular.json, allowing developers to configure different script loading strategies. Project Aurora identified three script loading strategies that we can reuse:

  • afterInteractive - this strategy would prioritize first-party scripts by executing third-party scripts after the page has been hydrated or client-side rendered.
  • beforeInteractive - execute third-party scripts before first-party scripts. This strategy is particularly important for loading polyfills. Since we already have polyfill.ts, I'm a little hesitant to include it in the Angular CLI as part of the first feature iteration. I'd suggest keeping it out of scope and collecting feedback in the meantime.
  • lazyOnload - lowest priority. We load these scripts and execute them in requestIdleCallback. Examples for libraries using this strategy for prefetching are quicklink, ngx-quicklink, and guess-js.

We'd sometimes need a hook after the script has been loaded and executed if we load it asynchronously (afterInteractive or lazyOnload). For example, rendering a payment dialog after we've downloaded a third-party SDK.

Using angular.json does not provide an evident approach that would let us accomplish this. A lower-level API that would provide the necessary functionality is to allows developers to specify id's in the script declaration. Using the id, developers will discover the script element in their code and hook to its onload event.

This way, the scripts property in angular.json would change from an array of strings or objects to an array of strings or objects with the following properties:

  • input - the source URL or path of the script. The CLI will perform different actions depending on whether input is a local path or a remote URL
  • strategy - afterInteractive, beforeInteractive, or lazyOnload
  • inject - specifies if the script should be injected or not. We preserve the current semantics of the inject property in the script object
  • bundleName - applicable for local scripts only. For external scripts, we can throw an error
  • id - an optional identifier that the developer can use to get a hold of the script and hook to its onload event

Suppose we find a string rather than an object for a given script. In that case, we can treat it as a script object with an input the specified string, strategy equal to beforeInteractive for the current major, or afterInteractive for the next major. Ideally, we'd want the default strategy to be afterInteractive to prevent folks from causing performance regressions, but since this would be a breaking change, we don't want to do this until v13.

In v13, we can migrate all the scripts from objects to strings using the beforeInteractive strategy.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Project Aurora considered using a script component for alternative frameworks. Their approach easier accommodates the onLoad callback use case but seems to fit less naturally in the Angular CLI model.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
27k
Forks
11.8k
Avg merge
16h 35m
Merged PRs (30d)
176

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from angular/angular-cli

All issues in angular/angular-cli

Similar issues

More TypeScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.