[Indicator]: Targeting assurance questions

Open
#195 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
20/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python, r
Domain
data

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points; it only requests a new “Targeting assurance indicator” and lists R, SPSS, Stata, and Python tasks. Start by reviewing existing indicator implementations and clarifying the indicator definition and expected outputs with the owning unit. Done should include the requested scripts and a way to verify the indicator, but the issue does not specify those checks.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Under-review
Indicator name

Targeting assurance indicator

Create or modify indicator?

Create

Contact Details

federica.esu@wfp.org

Corporate Result Framework

Pilot

Unit owning the indicator

APPFA

Batch of tasks created - DO NOT MODIFY
  • [Task]: R script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
  • [Task]: SPSS script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
  • [Task]: Stata script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
Software version

R, SPSS, Stata, Python

Relevant log output
Code of Conduct
  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
Dominant language
Scheme
Stars
35
Forks
31
Avg merge
1d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts

All issues in WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts

Similar issues

More Data Engineering issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.