MDDI - Duplicate FCS and RCS code in MDDI
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- data
Research direction
Start in Indicators/Multidimensional-deprivation-index/MDDI-indicator.sps, especially lines 14-78, and inspect how the FCS and RCS code is duplicated. Identify the required calculated indicators already used by the script, then replace the duplicate definitions with a presence check or warning. Done means the duplication is removed and missing required indicators are reported clearly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
These codes should be removed and replaced with a check/warning for presence of required calculated indicators.
Don't Repeat Yourself!!
- Dominant language
- Scheme
- Stars
- 35
- Forks
- 31
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts
-
rCSI computations Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts#249 ·
-
WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts#242 · 2 assignees ·
-
WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts#241 · 1 assignee ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts#240 ·
All issues in WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
cisagov/cyhy-reports#149 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
open-compass/VLMEvalKit#1698 ·